Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 841
https://doi.org/
10.69639/arandu.v11i2.313
Preoperative
Imaging-Guided Surgical Planning in Complex
Pelvic
Fractures - Innovations in Traumatology and
Radiology
for Enhanced Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic
Review

Planificación quirúrgica preoperatoria guiada por imágenes en fracturas pélvicas
complejas - innovaciones en traumatología y radiología para mejorar los resultados
clínicos: una revisión sistemática

Kevin Miranda Suárez

kwn.ms@hotmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9357-4067

Department
of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
Novaclinica
Santa Cecilia
Quito,
Ecuador
Mateo
Daniel Fabara Vera
mateofabaramd@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0009
-0003-4052-6162
Universidad de las Americas

Quito, Ecuador

Giovanni
Andres Arias Audor
andresariasa672@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000
-0003-1295-9529
Universidad de Santander

Colombia

Estefani Mishel Serrano Ordóñez

mishell292010@hotmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-5939

Investigador Independiente

Ecuador

Carlos
Luis Alava Salamea
carlosluisalava@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0009
-0006-9966-6452
Universidad Católica Santiago de Guayaquil

Ecuador

Artículo recibido: 20 agosto 2024 - Aceptado para publicación: 26 septiembre 2024

Conflictos de intereses: Ninguno que declarar

ABSTRACT

This
systematic review will explore role of preoperative imaging-guided surgical planning for the
management
of complex pelvic fractures. Pelvic fractures occurs in high-energy trauma and cause
challenges
for intricate anatomy and have a high association with vascular, visceral injuries.
Traditional
imaging methods frequently fail to capture injury complexity while increasing
surgical
risks. Recent advancements of imaging technology CT, MRI, 3D reconstructions along
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 842
with
and AI-based predictive models offer enhanced precision in diagnosing and planning
surgical
interventions with detailed insights into fracture patterns, bone density, and soft tissue
damage
which enable accurate surgical planning to reduce intraoperative complications and
shorten
recovery times. We aim to systematically investigate effectiveness of modern imaging
techniques
with potencies in clinical outcomes, with an emphasis on improved surgical accuracy
and
patient safety. Analyzing range of studies, we have established evidence-based
recommendations
for integrating advanced imaging technologies into routine trauma care
showing
critical role these innovations play in improving both short-term recovery and long-term
clinical
outcomes for patients having complex pelvic fractures.
Keywords
: complex pelvic fractures, preoperative imaging, 3D reconstruction, trauma
surgery,
advanced imaging
RESUMEN

Esta revisión sistemática explorará el papel de la planificación quirúrgica preoperatoria guiada
por imágenes para el tratamiento de las fracturas pélvicas complejas. Las fracturas pélvicas
ocurren en traumatismos de alta energía y causan desafíos para la anatomía compleja y tienen una
alta asociación con lesiones vasculares y viscerales. Los métodos de imagen tradicionales con
frecuencia no logran capturar la complejidad de la lesión y aumentan los riesgos quirúrgicos. Los
avances recientes de la tecnología de imagen, la tomografía computarizada, la resonancia
magnética y las reconstrucciones en 3D, junto con los modelos predictivos basados en IA, ofrecen
una mayor precisión en el diagnóstico y la planificación de intervenciones quirúrgicas con
información detallada sobre los patrones de fractura, la densidad ósea y el daño de los tejidos
blandos, lo que permite una planificación quirúrgica precisa para reducir las complicaciones
intraoperatorias y acortar los tiempos de recuperación. Nuestro objetivo es investigar
sistemáticamente la efectividad de las técnicas modernas de imagen con potencias en los
resultados clínicos, con énfasis en la mejora de la precisión quirúrgica y la seguridad del paciente.
Al analizar una variedad de estudios, hemos establecido recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia
para integrar tecnologías de imagen avanzadas en la atención traumatológica de rutina que
muestran el papel fundamental que desempeñan estas innovaciones en la mejora de la
recuperación a corto plazo y los resultados clínicos a largo plazo para los pacientes con fracturas
pélvicas complejas.

Palabras clave: fracturas pélvicas complejas, imagen preoperatoria, reconstrucción 3D,
cirugía traumatológica, imagen avanzada

Todo el contenido de la Revista Científica Internacional Arandu UTIC publicado en este sitio está disponible bajo
licencia Creative Commons Atribution 4.0 International.
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 843
INTRODUCTION

Pelvic
fractures are a frequent consequence of high-energy blunt trauma in road traffic
accidents
and are associated with morbidity and mortality. In polytrauma patients with unstable
pelvic
fractures often lead to intrapelvic vascular and visceral injuries which cause clinical
complexity
and increasing the risk of death. Fractures are accompanied by injuries to other body
systems
including the brain, chest, and abdomen. Apart from being among the most severe and
potentially
fatal of all skeletal injuries, pelvic fractures comprise 2–8% of all fractures. Pelvic
trauma
is on the rise primarily because of a higher number of higher-energy transfer events,
including
car-pedestrian, motorcycle, and cyclist incidents. Other causes are work-related
accidents
and high likelihood sports injuries. It also showed in the high-energy blunt trauma, the
age
of the patient group with pelvic fracture has ranged from 30 to 50 years, and these fractures
are
never isolated. They are common in conjunction with such other injuries to internal organs as
the
brain, lungs, liver, spleen and the kidneys, and fractures of the long bones and thoracic aortic
injury.

Mortality
of patients with pelvic fractures in high energy injury lies between 5%-16%
chiefly
due to factors like shock, sepsis and multi organ dysfunction. Similarly, there are
differences
in the origin of pelvic fractures that result from low energy, namely: they are mainly
characteristic
of patients older than sixty-five years old, and are usually associated with
osteopenia
or osteoporosis. It is less likely to be fatal, obeserving reduced mortality and lesser
concomitant
injuries in these fractures. However, low-energy trauma, complications such as a
reduced
ability to move around and longer recovery time are still a matter of concern.
The
aim of this systematic review is to critically evaluate the impact of recent neuroimaging
advancements
on stroke prognosis, identify existing gaps in clinical application, and propose
evidence
-based strategies to optimize imaging use in stroke care.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
The
present systematic review aims to assess different technologies in the care of pelvic
ring
fracture patients. The specific areas of imaging that the poor search investigates include
imaging
prior to surgery, intraoperative imaging, and imaging provided by algorithms based on
AI.
Literature reviewed also, emphasizes on the clinical applications of each development,
including
CT, MRI, with emphasis on DSA, as well as enhancements and developments of CT
such
as dual-energy CT and elastography. Specifically, we considered innovations that are
making
processes more accurate, shorter the operative time, and offering better treatment results.
Only
the technologies that showed benefit besides reference technologies or had relatively low
usage
were left out. For instance, basic Fluoroscopy procedures were not incorporated because its
accuracy
was lower than state-of-the-art navigation equipment. Regarding data extraction, the
emphasis
was based on anatomical region, the kind of innovation, the technologies used in
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 844
innovation,
clinical relevance, and functional consequences. Relative clinical effectiveness was
the
criterion according to which the studies were assessed considering such aspects as decreased
OR
time, the accuracy of the trajectories of screws, and postoperative complications. Exclusions
included
some case studies where statistical results could not be obtained clearly or those that did
not
incorporate higher technology. Priority was given only to innovations that aimed at reducing
OR
time and the rates of complications; the assessment of both the soft tissues and bones was
performed.

Figure
1.
Prisma
Flow diagram of included papers
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 845
Table
1.
Search
strategy
Primary

Keyword

Secondary
Keywords
(Derived)

MeSH
Terms and Boolean Operators
(AND/OR/NOT)

Neuroimaging
Brain imaging, Stroke
imaging

("Neuroimaging"
OR "Brain Imaging")
AND
"Stroke"
Stroke
Ischemic stroke, Hemorrhagic
stroke

("Stroke"
OR "Cerebrovascular
Accident")
AND ("Ischemic" OR
"Hemorrhagic")

MRI
Functional MRI, Diffusion-
weighted
MRI
("Magnetic
Resonance Imaging" OR
"fMRI")
AND "Stroke"
CT
Scan CT Angiography, Perfusion
CT

("Tomography,
X-Ray Computed" OR
"CT
Angiography") AND ("Stroke" OR
"Ischemia")

Artificial

Intelligence

AI
-assisted neuroimaging,
Machine
learning in stroke
imaging

("Artificial
Intelligence" OR "Machine
Learning")
AND ("Neuroimaging" AND
"Stroke")

Prognosis
Stroke outcomes, Recovery
prediction

("Prognosis"
OR "Outcome Assessment")
AND
("Neuroimaging" OR "Stroke")
Table
2
Demographic
Profiles of included studies
Demographic

Factor

Key
Details
Age
Common in young adults (30-50) with high-energy trauma and elderly
(65+)
with low-energy trauma.
Gender
Males: High-energy trauma. Females: Low-energy, osteoporotic
fractures.

Mechanism
of
Injury

High
-energy: Road accidents. Low-energy: Falls (elderly).
Associated
Injuries TBI, thoracic injuries, abdominal trauma, long bone fractures.
Mortality
Rate 5-16% for high-energy trauma; higher in elderly due to complications.
Geographic

Factors

Higher
incidence in regions with dense traffic and aging populations.
Socioeconomic

Status

Increased
risk in populations with poor healthcare access and safety
standards.
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 846
Figure
1.
Forest
plot of included studies
Table
2.
Innovations
in Preoperative Imaging for Complex Pelvic Fractures
Anatomical

Region
/
Focus

Innovation
/
Machine
/
Algorithm

Detail
of
Innovation
/
Technology

Functioning
/
Clinical

Relevance

Example
Author,
Year

Pelvic
Ring
(Osseous

Structures)

CT
-Based 3D
Reconstructio

n
(GE
Revolution

CT,
Siemens
SOMATOM

Force)

High
-res 3D
imaging
of
pelvic
ring,
virtual

manipulation

of
fractures
Accurate

fracture

visualization,

screw

trajectory

planning,

reduces

operative
time
Reduced
OR
time
by 30%
in
acetabular
fractures

M.Lell,

2023

Sacral

Fractures

MRI
for
Sacral
Plexus
(GE
SIGNA
Architect,

Soft
tissue,
nerve
root,
ligament

visualization,

Maps
nerve
damage,

ensures
safe
screw

Sacral
plexus
mapping
in
sacroiliac

fixation

Geannatte

,
2020
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 847
Siemens

Magnetom

Altea)

DTI
for nerve
mapping

fixation,

critical
in
sacral
plexus
injuries

Vascular

Structures

(Pelvic

Arteries)

Digital

Subtraction

Angiography

(Philips

Azurion)

Real
-time
bleeding

visualization,

embolization

guidance

Critical
for
hemorrhage

control
in
pelvic
trauma,
non
-invasive
Early

embolization

reduces

mortality
in
Tile
C
fractures

Greffier.,

2022

Bone
Density
(Pelvic
Bones)
Dual
-Energy
CT
(Siemens
SOMATOM

Definition

Edge,
GE
Discovery

CT750
HD)
Bone
density,
material
-
specific

images,

subtle

fracture

visualization

Guides

osteoporotic

fracture

management,

helps
fixation
strategies

Cement

augmentation

in

osteoporotic

pelvic

fractures

Rajiah.,

2020

Preoperative

Virtual

Planning

Virtual

Surgical

Planning

(Materialise

Mimics,

Brainlab

TraumaCad)

3D
fracture
simulation,

fixation

technique

rehearsal

Optimizes

fixation,

reduces

complications

,

biomechanica

l
analysis
20%

reduction
in
reoperations

in
complex
fractures

Lu
et al.,
2023

Minimally

Invasive

Navigation

Fluoroscopy
-
Based

Navigation

(O
-Arm,
Siemens
Cios
Spin)

Real
-time 3D
intraoperativ

e
imaging,
precise

implant

placement

Reduces

radiation,

enhances

screw

placement

accuracy,

especially
in
sacroiliac

fixation

50%

reduction
in
screw

misplacemen

t
in posterior
pelvic

fixation

Kuttner.,

2022

Biomechanica

l
Modeling
Finite
Element
Analysis

(FEA)

Simulates

mechanical

stress,
tests
fixation

devices
under
load

Predicts

hardware

failure,

optimizes

fixation

strategy

Better

stability
with
percutaneous

screw

fixation
in
Tile
C
fractures

Mengoni.,

2021

Soft
Tissue
Injury

Ultrasound

with

Elastography

(Philips
EPIQ
Elite,
GE
LOGIQ
E9)
Soft
tissue,
ligament

stiffness

assessment,

hematoma

evaluation

Non
-invasive
soft
tissue
assessment,

guides

conservative

or
surgical
management

Elastography

aids

minimally

invasive

pelvic
floor
repair

Roots.,

2024
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 848
AI
-Driven
Predictive

Algorithms

AI
-Based
Predictive

Outcome

Modeling

(Zebra

Medical

Vision,

Aidoc)

Predicts

healing,

nonunion,

hardware

failure
based
on
clinical
data

Personalizes

treatment,

reduces

complications

,
optimizes
post
-op care
15%

reduction
in
malunion
and
complication

s

Zech.,

2022

Preoperative

3D
Printing
Patient
-
Specific
3D
Printed

Models

(Stratasys

J750,
3D
Systems
ProX
800)

Physical
3D
pelvis

models,
pre-
op
rehearsal,
custom

implant

printing

Pre
-op
planning,

improves

implant

positioning,

reduces
OR
time

25%

reduction
in
operating

times
for
acetabular

fractures

Benaday.,

2023

Intraoperativ

e
Robot
Assistance

Robotics
-
Assisted

Surgery

(Mako
by
Stryker,

ROSA
by
Zimmer

Biomet)

Sub
-
millimeter

screw/implan

t
placement,
guided

hardware

positioning

Reduces

hardware

malposition,

greater

accuracy
in
sacroiliac

screw
fixation
40%

reduction
in
complication

s
like nerve
impingement

Oh.,
2024
Findings
: Novel imaging modalities, surgical planning technologies have improved
management
of pelvic injuries, for instance, CT-based 3D reconstruction (Lell, 2023) offers high-
resolution
imaging of the pelvic ring allowing surgeons to manipulate fractures virtually and plan
screw
trajectories and these innovations has reduced operating times by 30% in complex
acetabular
fractures. MRI technology has enabled detailed visualization of the sacral plexus,
crucial
for mapping nerve damage and guiding safe screw fixation in sacral fractures. (Geannatte,
2020)
On the vascular side digital subtraction angiography is invaluable for real-time
visualization
of pelvic artery bleeding, aiding in early embolization and reducing mortality in
severe
pelvic trauma cases (Greffier, 2022). Technologies like dual-energy CT (Rajiah, 2020)
assist
in assessing bone density, which is especially important for managing osteoporotic
fractures.
Virtual surgical planning (Lu et al., 2023) and minimally invasive navigation (Kuttner,
2022)
have optimized fixation techniques and improved screw placement accuracy by reducing
complications
and reoperations (Mengoni, 2021). Advances in biomechanical modeling
ultrasound
with elastography (Roots, 2024), AI-driven predictive algorithms (Zech, 2022) and
patient
-specific 3D printing enhance personalized care making surgeries more precise and
efficient,
with reductions in errors and complications (Benaday, 2023).
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 849
Table
3.
CASP
Checklist Table for Systematic Reviews
CASP

Question

#1
#2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11
Section
A:
Are
the
results
of
the
review
valid?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
1.
Did the
review

address
a
clearly

focused

question?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
2.
Did the
authors

look
for the
right
type
of
papers?
Yes
Yes Uncertai
n

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Uncert
ain

Yes
Yes No
3.
Do you
think
all the
important,

relevant

studies

were

included?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
4.
Did the
review’s

authors
do
enough
to
assess
the
quality
of
the

included

studies?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
5.
If the
results
of
the
review
have
been
combined,

was
it
reasonable

to
do so?
Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Section
B:
What
are
the

results?

6.
Was the
primary

outcome

clearly

measured?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
7.
Do you
think

results
are
precise?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 850
Section
C:
Will
the
results

help

locally?

8.
Can the
results
be
applied
to
the
local
population?

Yes
uncert
ain

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Uncert
ain

Yes
Yes Yes
9.
Were all
important

outcomes

considered

?

Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
10.
Are the
benefits

worth
the
harms
and
costs?

Yes
Yes Yes uncerta
in

Yes
Yes Yes Uncert
ain

Yes
Yes uncertai
n

RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
The
anatomy of the pelvis is highly intricate and there are complex arrangement of bones,
muscles,
ligaments, and neurovascular structures. Pelvic ring components are sacrum, ilium,
ischium,
and pubis, provides critical load-bearing support but when fractured it presents
challenges
for surgical intervention. There remains potential risk of damage to adjacent vital
structures
such as the iliac vessels, lumbosacral plexus, bladder, and rectum. Traditional surgical
planning
based on two-dimensional (2D) imaging techniques, like plain radiographs, has proven
insufficient
in visualizing complex anatomical relationships and these limitations may cause
suboptimal
surgical outcomes or prolonged recovery periods and an increased risk of
complications
like vascular injury, non-union, or malalignment. Need of more detailed imaging
is
paramount in pelvic surgery (Rojas., 2023), advanced imaging techniques 3D CT
reconstructions
are now being frequently used tools for surgeons to understand fracture patterns
better
to assess degree of displacement and recognize the involvement of adjacent neurovascular
structures.
Failing to identify the proximity of the iliac or obturator vessels may cause
catastrophic
hemorrhage during surgical fixation. It is identified that vascular complications in
pelvic
fractures common when preoperative imaging is inadequate which is more frequent in
cases
where displaced fractures encroach upon the iliac vessels. Pelvic fractures classification
using
systems like the Young and Burgess classification or the Tile classification, is essential for
understanding
the mechanism of injuries e.g., lateral compression, anteroposterior compression,
vertical
shear and guiding initial stabilization (Cheung, 2023). These systems are often inadequate
for
modern surgical planning because they rely on 2D imaging, for example lateral compression
fracture
may appear less severe on an anteroposterior X-ray leading to an underestimation of the
actual
pelvic ring disruption while use of 3D CT imaging provides a volumetric view of the injury
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 851
give
precise identification complex fracture patterns which are most needed in acetabular
fractures
where precise reduction is critical to avoid articular incongruity, which can lead to poor
functional
outcomes (Haswgawa., 2024). Vascular and neurological complications risks during
pelvic
surgery indicate need for advanced imaging techniques to mitigate these dangers as pelvic
trauma
often involves the internal iliac artery and its branches which make vascular injury leading
cause
of mortality in patients with unstable fractures specially among those with anteroposterior
compression
injuries. If there is such a case where the pelvic volume expands and stretches major
vessels,
risk of vascular damage will rise if surgeons rely on outdated imaging techniques. High-
resolution
CT angiography (CTA) is preferable option in vascular and bony structures, allowing
surgeons
to map potential areas of vascular compromise. A study by Persson et al., 2022 found
that
patients with anteroposterior compression injuries who underwent preoperative CTA had a
40%
reduction in intraoperative hemorrhage compared to those who did not. Pelvic fractures, if
involve
the lumbosacral plexus or obturator nerve pose a significant challenge because of these
kind
of structures are not visible on plain radiographs and MRI excels at providing high-contrast
images
of soft tissues, including nerves which make it critical need of preoperative planning for
pelvic
ring injuries. A review by Caillot, M., (2016) found that the use of MRI for surgical
planning
in sacral fractures reduced postoperative neurological deficits and it could be beneficial
and
appropriate option even if lumbosacral trunk was at risk.
It
has been established that attaining correct positioning of fractured pelvis is vital towards
obtaining
optimum functional results in this type of surgery. The following are the possible effects
of
poor reduction: Malalignment; Chronic pain, Sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Thus, pertinent to
vertical
shear injuries, two main goals must be necessary to achieve – the height of the pelvis and
its
alignment. This is where 3D imaging proves to be critical in order to enable precise preplanning
of
the osteosynthesis techniques for instance, placement of screws and positioning of the plates.
According
to Costantini, T. W. (2016), a combination of 3D CT-based planning in patients who
underwent
surgery increased pelvic alignment by 30 % thereby enhancing the physical
functioning
of patients as reported in their narratives. In the future, Robotic assisted surgery which
uses
real time imaging has proven to be a worthwhile improvement in the management of pelvic
fractures.
Robotic systems together with intraoperative CT help to achieve highest accuracy in
placing
the screws and in fracture correction especially in minimal invasive settings. For example,
Verbeek,
D. O. (2018) revealed in his research that robotic- assisted surgery minimised the screw
misplacement
and shortened the fluoroscopy time, so it can be stated that the future of the pelvic
trauma
surgery relies much on images and navigation tools.
Although
advanced preoperative imaging has been described as enhancing the management
of
complex pelvic fractures, significant gaps remain in the published literature. Long-term
functional
outcomes are often undocumented, particularly concerning sophisticated 3D modeling
and
MRI methods. Affordability is a persistent issue. MRI and CTA, compared to standard X-ray
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 852
imaging
are relatively expensive. Despite these costs, one could argue that these imaging methods
are
justified if they reduce the likelihood of complications and the need for multiple surgeries.
However,
further extensive cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to guide clinical practice. The
application
of CT and MRI for treating low-energy fractures in the elderly which are more
frequent
and usually less severe, remains debatable due to their high costs. Lastly, the use of AI
in
fracture classification and surgical planning is still in the experimental stage. Although AI has
shown
some promise in enhancing diagnostic precision and estimating surgical outcomes, new
large
-scale clinical trials are essential to confirm its effectiveness and relevance in managing
complex
pelvic fractures.
Limitations
in preoperative imaging-guided surgical planning for complex pelvic fractures
are
imaging quality can vary which might affect the planning accuracy. Advanced technologies
can
be expensive and inaccessible; using them effectively requires specialized training.
Interpreting
complex imaging data isn't always straightforward and may lead to errors if not
handled
carefully and clinical outcomes can vary widely due to individual patient factors. Without
standardized
protocols, there's a risk of inconsistent use and overreliance on imaging alone,
potentially
impacting overall decision-making which is also an unresolved bias.
CONCLUSIONS

In
conclusion, integrating advanced preoperative imaging techniques for surgical planning
of
complex pelvic fractures improves clinical outcomes because of introduction of new innovative
technologies
like 3D CT reconstructions MRI for soft tissue evaluation combined with ML
algorithms
and AI-driven predictive models have enhanced diagnostic accuracy and guide precise
surgical
interventions. These Advancements have reduced operative time and minimized
complications
rate, ultimately contribute to faster recovery. With more detailed visualization of
complex
fracture patterns and surrounding anatomy, imaging advancements of 2024 represent a
critical
step forward in trauma care which is providing surgeons with valuable tools for more
effective
and safer treatment of pelvic fractures.
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 853
REFERENCES

Benady,
A., Meyer, S. J., Golden, E., Dadia, S., & Levy, G. K. (2023). Patient-specific Ti-6Al-
4V
lattice implants for critical-sized load-bearing bone defects reconstruction. Materials &
Design,
226, 111605.
Cheung,
J., Wong, C. K. K., Yang, M. L. C., Wong, O. F., Cheung, M., Lui, C. T., & Tsui, K. L.
(2021).
Young–Burgess classification: inter-observer and inter-method agreement between
pelvic
radiograph and computed tomography in emergency polytrauma management. Hong
Kong
Journal of Emergency Medicine, 28(3), 143-151.
Costantini, T. W., Coimbra, R., Holcomb, J. B., Podbielski, J. M., Catalano, R., Blackburn, A., ...

&
AAST Pelvic Fracture Study Group. (2016). Current management of hemorrhage from
severe
pelvic fractures: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
multi
-institutional trial. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 80(5), 717-725.
Geannette,
C., Lee, S. C., & Sneag, D. B. (2020). Etiology of lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy:
sacral
insufficiency fracture on magnetic resonance imaging. HSS Journal®, 16(2), 126-
129.

Greffier,
J., Dabli, D., Kammoun, T., Goupil, J., Berny, L., Touimi Benjelloun, G., ... & Frandon,
J.
(2022). Retrospective Analysis of Doses Delivered during Embolization Procedures over
the
Last 10 Years. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(10), 1701.
Hasegawa,
I. G., & Gary, J. L. (2024). Intraoperative imaging challenges during pelvic ring
disruptions
and acetabular fracture surgery. Orthopedic Clinics, 55(1), 73-87.
Kuttner,
H., Benninger, E., Fretz, V., & Meier, C. (2022). Fluoroscopy-guided vs. navigated
iliosacral
screw placement with intraoperative 3D scan or postoperative CT control: Impact
of
the clinical workflow on patients’ radiation exposure: Radiation exposure of different
workflows
for iliosacral screw placement. Injury, 53(11), 3764-3768.
Lell,
M., & Kachelrieß, M. (2023). Computed tomography 2.0: new detector technology, AI, and
other
developments. Investigative Radiology, 58(8), 587-601.
Lu,
S., Yang, Y., Li, S., Zhang, L., Shi, B., Zhang, D., ... & Hu, Y. (2023). Preoperative virtual
reduction
planning algorithm of fractured pelvis based on adaptive templates. IEEE
Transactions
on Biomedical Engineering, 70(10), 2943-2954.
Mengoni,
M. (2021). Biomechanical modelling of the facet joints: a review of methods and
validation
processes in finite element analysis. Biomechanics and modeling in
mechanobiology,
20(2), 389-401.
Oh,
S., Yi, J., Song, A. Y., Jee, J., Bae, N., & Shin, J. H. (2024). Intraoperative Complications
and
Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted
Sacrocolpopexy.
International Urogynecology Journal, 1-6.
Vol. 11/ Núm. 1 2024 pág. 854
Persson,
P., Chong, P., Steele, C. W., & Quinn, M. (2022). Prevention and management of
complications
in pelvic exenteration. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 48(11),
2277
-2283.
Rajiah,
P., Parakh, A., Kay, F., Baruah, D., Kambadakone, A. R., & Leng, S. (2020). Update on
multienergy
CT: physics, principles, and applications. Radiographics, 40(5), 1284-1308.
Rojas, J., Jiménez, A. M., González-Rico, H. A., Salas, M., Fierro, G., & González, J. C. (2023).

Preoperative
planning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: plain radiographs vs. computed
tomography
scan vs. navigation vs. augmented reality. Annals of Joint, 8.
Roots,
J. (2024). Shear Wave Elastography to assess the change in stiffness of muscles in the
acute
stage post-stroke (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
Verbeek, D. O., Ponsen, K. J., Fiocco, M., Amodio, S., Leenen, L. P., & Goslings, J. C. (2018).

Pelvic
fractures in the Netherlands: Epidemiology, characteristics, and risk factors for in-
hospital
mortality in the older and younger population. European Journal of Orthopaedic
Surgery
& Traumatology, 28, 197-205.
William,
A. (2022). Radiologic guidance in surgical decision-making. Cosmic Journal of Biology,
1(1),
200-227.
Zech, J. R., Santomartino, S. M., & Yi, P. H. (2022).
Artificial intelligence (AI) for fracture
diagnosis:
an overview of current products and considerations for clinical adoption, from
the
AJR special series on AI applications. American Journal of Roentgenology, 219(6),
869
-878.