Perceptions of Design Thinking Implementation in Ecuadorian EFL Classrooms

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v13i3.2398

Palabras clave:

Design Thinking, EFL pedagogy, mixed-methods research, teacher perceptions, communicative competence

Resumen

This study explores Ecuadorian university teachers’ perceptions of applying the Design Thinking (DT) approach in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. In the Ecuadorian labor market, employers increasingly demand graduates who demonstrate not only linguistic proficiency but also critical thinking, collaboration, adaptability, and problem-solving skills. However, many university EFL programs continue to rely on traditional, teacher-centered practices that may not fully respond to these professional demands. Teachers therefore recognize the need for innovative pedagogical approaches capable of aligning language instruction with workplace competencies, and DT emerges as a promising alternative. Grounded in a mixed-methods research design, the study investigates how teachers implement the five stages of Design Thinking and how they perceive its impact on students’ EFL skill development, benefits, and contextual challenges. Unlike intervention-based research, this study does not implement a controlled experimental treatment; rather, it examines teachers’ reflective experiences and professional judgments regarding the integration of DT into their existing pedagogical practices. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with university EFL instructors, while quantitative data were obtained through a structured survey examining perceptions of improvements specially in speaking, listening, reading, writing, and vocabulary. Findings indicate strong perceived enhancement in oral communication fluency and confidence, engagement, alongside increased learner autonomy and critical thinking. Despite constraints related to time and curriculum alignment, teachers perceive DT as a transformative and context-responsive framework for Ecuadorian public university EFL settings.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Affifi, A. (2023). Design thinking: An approach to develop writing performance (secondary EFL). ERIC.

Almache-Granda, G., Aguilar-Parra, J., Ramírez-Romero, E., & Coello-Vásquez, V. (2024). Design thinking to facilitate the development of TEFL students’ competencies. Polo del Conocimiento, 9(12), 1345–1361. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/8545

Almalki, A. (2023). The impact of integrating design thinking on EFL students’ oral performance. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 11(2), 45–52.

Alrehalil, T., & Alhawsawi, S. (2022). The effectiveness of design thinking in improving English language learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 321–338.

Alvarado, L. (2025). Design thinking and innovation in higher education learning environments. [Manuscript in preparation].

Baum, A. (2021). Applying design thinking in education: Innovative teaching strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1543–1561.

Brown, H. D. (2007a). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. (2007b). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Harvard Business Press.

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Enhancing student engagement through design thinking: A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.101013

Cleminson, T., & Cowie, N. (2021). Using design thinking as an approach to creative and communicative engagement in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(5), 63–81.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-08-06

Cómo citar

Mariscal Touzard, L., Castro Flores, M. I., Reeves Arboleda, S., Castillo Noriega, M. A., & Govea De Bustamante , L. D. C. (2026). Perceptions of Design Thinking Implementation in Ecuadorian EFL Classrooms. Arandu UTIC, 13(3), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v13i3.2398

Número

Sección

Ciencias de la Educación