Perceptions of Design Thinking Implementation in Ecuadorian EFL Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v13i3.2398Palabras clave:
Design Thinking, EFL pedagogy, mixed-methods research, teacher perceptions, communicative competenceResumen
This study explores Ecuadorian university teachers’ perceptions of applying the Design Thinking (DT) approach in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. In the Ecuadorian labor market, employers increasingly demand graduates who demonstrate not only linguistic proficiency but also critical thinking, collaboration, adaptability, and problem-solving skills. However, many university EFL programs continue to rely on traditional, teacher-centered practices that may not fully respond to these professional demands. Teachers therefore recognize the need for innovative pedagogical approaches capable of aligning language instruction with workplace competencies, and DT emerges as a promising alternative. Grounded in a mixed-methods research design, the study investigates how teachers implement the five stages of Design Thinking and how they perceive its impact on students’ EFL skill development, benefits, and contextual challenges. Unlike intervention-based research, this study does not implement a controlled experimental treatment; rather, it examines teachers’ reflective experiences and professional judgments regarding the integration of DT into their existing pedagogical practices. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with university EFL instructors, while quantitative data were obtained through a structured survey examining perceptions of improvements specially in speaking, listening, reading, writing, and vocabulary. Findings indicate strong perceived enhancement in oral communication fluency and confidence, engagement, alongside increased learner autonomy and critical thinking. Despite constraints related to time and curriculum alignment, teachers perceive DT as a transformative and context-responsive framework for Ecuadorian public university EFL settings.
Descargas
Citas
Affifi, A. (2023). Design thinking: An approach to develop writing performance (secondary EFL). ERIC.
Almache-Granda, G., Aguilar-Parra, J., Ramírez-Romero, E., & Coello-Vásquez, V. (2024). Design thinking to facilitate the development of TEFL students’ competencies. Polo del Conocimiento, 9(12), 1345–1361. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/8545
Almalki, A. (2023). The impact of integrating design thinking on EFL students’ oral performance. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 11(2), 45–52.
Alrehalil, T., & Alhawsawi, S. (2022). The effectiveness of design thinking in improving English language learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 321–338.
Alvarado, L. (2025). Design thinking and innovation in higher education learning environments. [Manuscript in preparation].
Baum, A. (2021). Applying design thinking in education: Innovative teaching strategies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1543–1561.
Brown, H. D. (2007a). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Brown, H. D. (2007b). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Harvard Business Press.
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Enhancing student engagement through design thinking: A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.101013
Cleminson, T., & Cowie, N. (2021). Using design thinking as an approach to creative and communicative engagement in the English as a Foreign Language classroom. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(5), 63–81.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. & Creswell J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Laura Mariscal Touzard, Mariuxi Iliana Castro Flores, Shirley Reeves Arboleda, Martha Amelia Castillo Noriega, Lidia Del Carmen Govea De Bustamante

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.














